What is the optimal rest time for muscle and strength gains? How could someone even answer that question? Utilising scientific research might be the best approach.
And that is what a video shared by House of Hypertrophy decided to do precisely. In this comprehensive video analysis, we delve into the intricate world of rest intervals between sets and their impact on both strength and hypertrophy outcomes.
The focus of the comparison centres around the durations of one, three, and five minutes, exploring the historical preferences of bodybuilders and powerlifters.
Historically, bodybuilders have favoured shorter rest intervals, as evidenced by a 1987 American paper reporting that bodybuilders rested anywhere from 10 to 90 seconds between sets. Even the iconic Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his book, recommended keeping rest periods to a minute or less. On the other hand, powerlifters, as per the same 1987 American Paper, tended to opt for longer rests, ranging from 120 to 420 seconds between sets.
Research Explains How to Build Muscle Whilst Losing Fat
The Optimal Rest Time for Muscle & Strength Gains
To unravel the scientific support for these practices, we turn to the literature, questioning whether shorter rests enhance muscle hypertrophy while longer rests contribute to muscle strength. The analysis uncovers a nuanced relationship, dependent on the amount of muscle mass involved in the exercises.
For exercises engaging a substantial muscle mass, such as compound movements and lower body isolation exercises, the evidence leans towards longer rest intervals. Studies from various years and countries consistently demonstrate that resting 2.5 to 3 minutes between sets elicits greater hypertrophy compared to shorter rest periods. This holds true for both trained and untrained individuals performing exercises like compound movements and leg presses.
5 Methods of Progressive Overload to Force Muscle Growth
However, the narrative takes an interesting turn when we shift our focus to five-minute rest intervals. An English study from 2016 suggests that while long-term hypertrophy outcomes weren’t evaluated, myofibrillar protein synthesis, a key factor in muscle growth, was overall superior with five minutes of rest compared to one minute. This finding challenges the notion that shorter rests, often believed to spike anabolic hormones, are superior for hypertrophy.
The discussion then explores the comparison between 2.5 to 3 minutes and five minutes of rest between sets, but unfortunately, precise research in this area is lacking. The closest study, a 2005 Finnish one, found similar quad gains between two and five minutes of rest, but confounding factors make the results less definitive.
In conclusion, while the evidence leans towards recommending 2.5 to 3 minutes of rest between sets for large muscle mass exercises, the efficacy of five-minute rest periods remains inconclusive, warranting further research. Individuals with time constraints may consider super setting opposing muscle groups to achieve longer rests between sets effectively.
Shifting the focus to exercises targeting smaller muscle masses, particularly isolation upper body exercises, the research is less refined but suggests that shorter rests, around 30 seconds, may be viable, if not potentially superior. Studies on bicep and tricep movements indicate that shorter rests could lead to greater gains, but more research is needed for a conclusive verdict.
How to Burn Fat Without Losing Muscle
The analysis also touches upon the question of whether more sets with shorter rests on large muscle mass movements can produce equivalent hypertrophy to fewer sets with longer rests. Evidence from a 2020 Brazilian study suggests that, indeed, more sets with shorter rest can yield similar hypertrophy, opening avenues for varied training approaches.
In the realm of muscle strength, the consensus leans towards longer rests being more favourable. Multiple studies, including ones from New York in 2016 and the USA in 1995, demonstrate that bench press and squat strength gains are superior with three minutes of rest compared to shorter intervals.
The exploration extends to even longer rest intervals, with a 2010 Brazilian study suggesting that three and five minutes produce similar strength gains, both surpassing the gains from one minute of rest. While the differences between three and five minutes are non-significant statistically, the data hints at a potential favouring of the five-minute rest period, though more research is needed for confirmation.
Bro Split, Upper/Lower, Full Body Workout Compared
In summary, the intricate interplay between rest intervals, muscle mass engaged, and training goals reveals a nuanced landscape. For hypertrophy in large muscle mass exercises, 2.5 to 3 minutes of rest appears advantageous, while the efficacy of five-minute rests requires further exploration. Shorter rests seem viable, if not potentially superior, for smaller muscle mass exercises. Strength gains generally Favor longer rest intervals, with three minutes showing superiority and five minutes holding promise.
As usual, more studies should be done regarding the optimal rest time for muscle and strength. As the scientific landscape evolves, individuals are encouraged to experiment with different rest intervals based on their preferences, time constraints, and training objectives.
Watch all the info explained in the video below.
If you are curious about the scientific studies taken into consideration for these findings, you can find them here:
Kraemer et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3667019/
Schoenfeld et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26605…
Longo et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35622…
Buresh et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19077…
Fink et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27984…
McKendry et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27126…
Ahtianien et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15507…
Fink et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28032…
Okazi et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28532…
Fink et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28474…
Robinson et al. – https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/ab…
de Salles et al. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19811…
How Long Should You Wait to Train a Muscle Again?
The Only 5 Exercises You Need to Look Super Jacked
Rest periods between sets play a crucial role in the process of building muscle and strength. The duration of rest intervals significantly influences the physiological responses and adaptations that occur during and after resistance training. Here’s why rest periods are important for these fitness goals:
- Energy Systems Recovery:
- ATP Replenishment: During intense exercise, muscles use adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for energy. Adequate rest between sets allows for the replenishment of ATP stores, ensuring that muscles have the energy required for the next set of exercises.
- Muscle Recovery and Repair:
- Glycogen Resynthesis: Rest periods contribute to the replenishment of glycogen stores in muscles. Glycogen is a primary energy source during resistance training, and restoring these stores is vital for sustained performance and recovery.
- Cellular Repair: Microscopic damage occurs to muscle fibers during resistance training. Adequate rest allows for cellular repair and regeneration, leading to muscle growth over time.
- Hormonal Response:
- Anabolic Hormones: Rest periods influence hormonal responses, including the release of anabolic hormones such as testosterone and growth hormone. These hormones play a crucial role in muscle protein synthesis and overall muscle growth. Longer rest periods may enhance the release of these hormones.
- Cortisol Regulation: Cortisol, a catabolic hormone, can increase with prolonged exercise and inadequate rest. Controlled rest intervals help in managing cortisol levels, preventing excessive muscle breakdown.
- Lactate Clearance:
- Removal of Metabolic Byproducts: Short rests can lead to the accumulation of lactate and other metabolic byproducts. Longer rest intervals allow for the clearance of these byproducts, reducing fatigue and enhancing the muscle’s ability to perform in subsequent sets.
- Central Nervous System (CNS) Recovery:
- Neuromuscular Efficiency: The central nervous system coordinates muscle contractions. Adequate rest between sets prevents fatigue in the CNS, optimizing neuromuscular efficiency and maintaining proper form throughout the workout.
- Training Intensity and Volume:
- Maintaining Intensity: Longer rest intervals support the maintenance of high-intensity levels throughout a workout. This is essential for challenging the muscles adequately and promoting hypertrophy.
- Volume Management: Rest periods influence the overall volume of a workout (sets x reps x weight). Adjusting rest intervals allows for manipulation of training volume, a critical factor in determining the training stimulus and subsequent adaptations.
- Specific Adaptations:
- Strength vs. Hypertrophy: The optimal rest interval can vary based on specific training goals. Longer rests are often associated with strength training, allowing for maximal force production, while shorter rests may be employed for hypertrophy to induce metabolic stress.
- Individual Variability:
- Personalized Approach: Rest intervals can be highly individualized. Factors such as fitness level, age, and personal preferences influence the ideal rest duration for an individual. Tailoring rest periods to individual needs and responses is essential for optimizing results.
In conclusion, rest periods are a critical component of resistance training programs, impacting energy systems, muscle recovery, hormonal responses, and overall training outcomes. Balancing rest intervals based on specific goals and individual factors contributes to an effective and sustainable approach to building muscle and strength.
Light Weight vs Heavy Weights for Muscle Growth – Which is Better for You?
How to Make Muscle Gains At Every Level
Image Sources
- Barbell fatigue: Victor Freitas on Unsplash
- Man and barbell (2): Anastasia Shuraeva on Pexels